Artículos de revista

Permanent URI for this community

http://192.168.10.18:4000/handle/123456789/14

Browse

Browsing Artículos de revista by Author "Arana, Ana Edith"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Reliability and validity of a Spanish-language measure assessing clinical capacity to sustain Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) in resource-limited hospitals
    (2021) Agulnik, Asya; Malone, Sara; Puerto-Torres, Maria; Gonzalez-Ruiz, Alejandra; Vedaraju, Yuvanesh; Wang, Huiqi; Graetz, Dylan; Prewitt, Kim; Villegas, Cesar; Cardenas-Aguierre, Adolfo; Acuna, Carlos; Arana, Ana Edith; Díaz, Rosdali; Espinoza, Silvana; Guerrero, Karla; Martínez, Angélica; Mendez, Alejandra; Montalvo, Erika; Soberanis, Dora; Torelli, Antonella; Quelal, Janeth; Villanueva, Erika; Devidas, Meenakshi; Luke, Douglas; McKay, Virginia; EVAT Study Group
    Background: Paediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWSs) improve identification of deterioration, however, their sustainability has not been studied. Sustainability is critical to maximise impact of interventions like PEWS, particularly in low-resource settings. This study establishes the reliability and validity of a Spanish-language Clinical Sustainability Assessment Tool (CSAT) to assess clinical capacity to sustain interventions in resource-limited hospitals. Methods: Participants included PEWS implementation leadership teams of 29 paediatric cancer centres in Latin America involved in a collaborative to implement PEWS. The CSAT, a sustainability assessment tool validated in high-resource settings, was translated into Spanish and distributed to participants as an anonymous electronic survey. Psychometric, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and multivariate analyses were preformed to assess reliability, structure and initial validity. Focus groups were conducted after participants reviewed CSAT reports to assess their interpretation and utility. Results: The CSAT survey achieved an 80% response rate (n=169) with a mean score of 4.4 (of 5; 3.8-4.8 among centres). The CSAT had good reliability with an average internal consistency of 0.77 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.81); and CFAs supported the seven-domain structure. CSAT results were associated with respondents' perceptions of the evidence for PEWS, its implementation and use in their centre, and their assessment of the hospital culture and implementation climate. The mean CSAT score was higher among respondents at centres with longer time using PEWS (p<0.001). Focus group participants noted the CSAT report helped assess their centre's clinical capacity to sustain PEWS and provided constructive feedback for improvement. Conclusions: We present information supporting the reliability and validity of the CSAT tool, the first Spanish-language instrument to assess clinical capacity to sustain evidence-based interventions in hospitals of variable resource levels. This assessment demonstrates a high capacity to sustain PEWS in these resource-limited centres with improvement over time from PEWS implementation. Keywords: paediatric intensive & critical care; paediatric oncology; paediatrics; quality in health care; statistics & research methods.