Browsing by Author "Kortz, Teresa"

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Quality and capacity indicators for hospitalized pediatric oncology patients with critical illness: A modified delphi consensus
    (2020) Arias, Anita V; Garza, Marcela; Murthy, Srinivas; Cardenas, Adolfo; Diaz, Franco; Montalvo, Erika; Nielsen, Katie R; Kortz, Teresa; Sharara-Chami, Rana; Friedrich, Paola; McArthur, Jennifer; Agulnik, Asya
    Background Hospitalized pediatric hematology‐oncology (PHO) patients are at high risk for critical illness, especially in resource‐limited settings. Unfortunately, there are no established quality indicators to guide institutional improvement for these patients. The objective of this study was to identify quality indicators to include in PROACTIVE (PediatRic Oncology cApaCity assessment Tool for IntensiVe carE), an assessment tool to evaluate the capacity and quality of pediatric critical care services offered to PHO patients. Methods A comprehensive literature review identified relevant indicators in the areas of structure, performance, and outcomes. An international focus group sorted potential indicators using the framework of domains and subdomains. A modified, three‐round Delphi was conducted among 36 international experts with diverse experience in PHO and critical care in high‐resource and resource‐limited settings. Quality indicators were ranked on relevance and actionability via electronically distributed surveys. Results PROACTIVE contains 119 indicators among eight domains and 22 subdomains, with high‐median importance (≥7) in both relevance and actionability, and ≥80% evaluator agreement. The top five indicators were: (a) A designated PICU area; (b) Availability of a pediatric intensivist; (c) A PHO physician as part of the primary team caring for critically ill PHO patients; (d) Trained nursing staff in pediatric critical care; and (e) Timely PICU transfer of hospitalized PHO patients requiring escalation of care. Conclusions PROACTIVE is a consensus‐derived tool to assess the capacity and quality of pediatric onco‐critical care in resource‐limited settings. Future endeavors include validation of PROACTIVE by correlating the proposed indicators to clinical outcomes and its implementation to identify service delivery gaps amenable to improvement. Keywords: clinical cancer research, pediatric cancer, translational research
  • Thumbnail Image
    Publication
    Stages of change: Strategies to promote use of a Pediatric Early Warning System in resource‐limited pediatric oncology centers
    (2023) Woo, Marisa Cristin; Ferrara, Gia; Puerto-Torres, Maria; Gillipelli, Srinithya R; Elish, Paul; Muniz-Talavera, Hilmarie; Gonzalez-Ruiz, Alejandra; Armenta, Miriam; Barra, Camila; Diaz-Coronado, Rosdali; Hernandez, Cinthia; Juarez, Susana; Loeza, José; Mendez, Alejandra; Montalvo, Erika; Peñafiel, Eulalia; Pineda, Estuardo; Graetz, Dylan E; Kortz, Teresa; Agulnik, Asya
    Background Pediatric Early Warning Systems (PEWS) assist early detection of clinical deterioration in hospitalized children with cancer. Relevant to successful PEWS implementation, the “stages of change” model characterizes stakeholder support for PEWS based on willingness and effort to adopt the new practice. Methods At five resource‐limited pediatric oncology centers in Latin America, semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 71 hospital staff involved in PEWS implementation. Purposive sampling was used to select centers requiring variable time to complete PEWS implementation, with low‐barrier centers (3–4 months) and high‐barrier centers (10–11 months). Interviews were conducted in Spanish, professionally transcribed, and translated into English. Thematic content analysis explored “stage of change” with constant comparative analysis across stakeholder types and study sites. Results Participants identified six interventions (training, incentives, participation, evidence, persuasion, and modeling) and two policies (environmental planning and mandates) as effective strategies used by implementation leaders to promote stakeholder progression through stages of change. Key approaches involved presentation of evidence demonstrating PEWS effectiveness, persuasion and incentives addressing specific stakeholder interests, enthusiastic individuals serving as models for others, and policies enforced by hospital directors facilitating habitual PEWS use. Effective engagement targeted hospital directors during early implementation phases to provide programmatic legitimacy for clinical staff. Conclusion This study identifies strategies to promote adoption and maintained use of PEWS, highlighting the importance of tailoring implementation strategies to the motivations of each stakeholder type. These findings can guide efforts to implement PEWS and other evidence‐based practices that improve childhood cancer outcomes in resource‐limited hospitals. Keywords: behavioral science, clinical cancer research, clinical management, implementation science, pediatric cancer, Pediatric Early Warning Systems, resource‐limited, stages of change, transtheoretical model